[SATLUG] consider lighttpd

[Ernest de Leon]

use it currently...its absolutely great!

E

On 11/3/06, Travis H. <travis at nexus.subspacefield.org> wrote:
>
> Hey all, I've been fooling around with small web servers, because
> my needs aren't great, and I feel apache is too big of a target.
>
> Sorry Justizin, but I'm going to have to disagree with your implicit
> argument that popular means more secure (I'd say the opposite, you can
> prove me wrong by showing me one Plan 9 remote root exploit), or at
> least that there are more valuable apache targets to compromise,
> because worms aren't that smart, most attackers are just looking
> for an IP to abuse.
>
> Anyway, lighttpd has almost the same flexibility as apache - more
> in some ways, less in some ways.  It also is much faster, doesn't
> keep a pool of children around all the time, and it only uses about
> 1MB of memory for each server when not serving.
>
> Anyway, I just wanted people to know about it, I'm pretty satisfied
> so far.
> --
> "Cryptography is nothing more than a mathematical framework for
> discussing various paranoid delusions." -- Don Alvarez
> <URL:http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/> -><-
> --
> _______________________________________________
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
>



-- 
# Ernest De Leon

"If Microsoft is 'flexible' it explains how their head got where it is."