[SATLUG] Ubuntu x86 vs x86_64 Performance
David Kowis
dkowis at shlrm.org
Sat Feb 3 11:22:26 CST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Greg Willden wrote:
> I'm not really sure about speed issues but I'm just about fed up with
> 64 bit Linux. I'm running KUbuntu on this box (AMD64) and it is just
> annoying to not be able to get the third party stuff working on
> 64-bit.
>
> Plus if there are speed issues then why bother with 64 bit for this
> box. It is basically a desktop machine and a place to keep all my
> tunes.
> Greg
>
Heh. I've come to the same conclusion. Although, most of the stuff in my
amd64 box works like I want it to, it crashes with annoying regularity.
I cant really do anything, because it's not reliable. So, if 32-bit has
less death, then that's the way to go for me :)
- --
David Kowis
www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=l0SP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the SATLUG
mailing list