[SATLUG] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

Fri Feb 9 16:36:37 CST 2007

Folks,

Can someone explain to me how broken a mail system has to be in order 
to generate this kind of a bounce?

>Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2007 17:29:09 -0500 (EST)
>From: MAILER-DAEMON at smtp502.his.com (Mail Delivery System)
>Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
>To: brad at shub-internet.org
>X-pstn-levels:     (S:84.67455/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 
>M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
>X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
>X-pstn-addresses: from <MAILER-DAEMON at smtp502.his.com> [2951/119]
>
>Content-Description: Notification
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>This is the Postfix program at host smtp303.his.com.
>
>I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
>be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>
>For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
>
>If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
>delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>
>			The Postfix program
>
><rct at gherkin.frus.com>: host merkin.frus.com[192.158.254.50] said: 554
>     <brad at shub-internet.org>: Sender address rejected: Sender/source domain
>     mismatch (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>
>Content-Description: Delivery report
>Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>
>Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp303.his.com
>X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 8E6A215B567
>X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; brad at shub-internet.org
>Arrival-Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2007 17:28:48 -0500 (EST)
>
>Final-Recipient: rfc822; rct at gherkin.frus.com
>Action: failed
>Status: 5.0.0
>Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host merkin.frus.com[192.158.254.50] said: 554
>     <brad at shub-internet.org>: Sender address rejected: Sender/source domain
>     mismatch (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>	by smtp303.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6A215B567;
>	Fri,  9 Feb 2007 17:28:48 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from smtp303.his.com ([216.194.210.47])
>	by localhost (smtp303.his.com [216.194.210.47]) (amavisd-new, 
>port 10024)
>	with ESMTP id 26436-03-2; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:28:32 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from vhost109.his.com (vhost109.his.com [216.194.225.101])
>	by smtp303.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3609715B7C5;
>	Fri,  9 Feb 2007 17:28:32 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from [10.0.1.12] (localhost.his.com [127.0.0.1])
>	by vhost109.his.com (8.13.1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id l19MSMKd043453;
>	Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:28:31 -0500 (EST)
>	(envelope-from brad at shub-internet.org)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Message-Id: <p06240503c1f2a3ec9cc2@[10.0.1.12]>
>In-Reply-To: <20070209171631.A842CDBA1 at gherkin.frus.com>
>References: <20070209171631.A842CDBA1 at gherkin.frus.com>
>Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:23:42 -0600
>To: "The San Antonio Linux User's Group Mailing List" <satlug at satlug.org>
>From: Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org>
>Subject: Re: [SATLUG] [OT] Apple dmg's compressible?
>Cc: rct at gherkin.frus.com (Bob Tracy)
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp502.his.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.344 tagged_above=-99 required=5
>	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599]
>X-Spam-Score: -4.344
>X-Spam-Level:
>
>At 11:16 AM -0600 2/9/07, Bob Tracy quoted Jeremy Mann:
>
>>>   Bob, the DMG file is already compressed. Once you "open" the DMG for
>>>   the Xcode tools it comes out to about 1.5 gigs. You could try using
>>>   Stuffit to see if it will compress more, but doubtful.
>>
>>   That's what I was afraid of, but if I had thought about it for two
>>   seconds I would have guessed the images were already compressed.
>
>Not all .dmg files are compressed.  Some are compressed 
>after-the-fact using tools like StuffIt.
>
>However, regardless of how else it may be compressed, you may be 
>able to get further compression by using a better compression 
>program -- like bzip.  I've seen bzip get a compression ratio of 
>9-10x in cases where every other compression program I've used can't 
>get any better than 2.5-3x, so you might want to give it a try.
>
>It may not be installed on your box, but if so then it shouldn't be 
>hard to download, even if you have to download the source code and 
>build it on one system and then copy the binaries with the 
>compressed ..dmg file.
>
>--
>Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org>, Consultant & Author
>Co-author of SAGE Booklet #15 "Internet Postmaster: Duties and 
>Responsibilities"
>Founding Member and Platinum Individual Sponsor of LOPSA: 
><http://www.lopsa.org>
>Papers: <http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4> LinkedIn Profile: 
><http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>
>
-- 
Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org>, Consultant & Author
Co-author of SAGE Booklet #15 "Internet Postmaster: Duties and 
Responsibilities"
Founding Member and Platinum Individual Sponsor of LOPSA: 
<http://www.lopsa.org>
Papers: <http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4> LinkedIn Profile: 
<http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>