[SATLUG] Unified Authentication
Daniel J. Givens
daniel at rugmonster.org
Mon Feb 26 08:50:20 CST 2007
I'm one of the few that uses AD for more than authentication. It's one of the few things that I really like from Microsoft. For most people, in most situations, a Samba server acting as an NT4 domain controller works just fine. I need a lot of the features AD brings to the table in this situation.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:58:12 -0600, "Ernest de Leon" <dryicezero at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here at my shop, we use AD and winbind to authenticate against AD. We
> mainly use it for the proxy server, mail server, and collaboration
> software. I am in the process, however, of dropping AD and the DCs
> completely in favor of LDAP and SAMBA for share permissions only. We
> really use AD much for anything beyond authentication and share
> so it will be an easy fix once I have time to get to it.
> On 2/26/07, Daniel J. Givens <daniel at rugmonster.org> wrote:
>> I'm setting up a hybrid, Windows/Linux network at work. I have Active
>> running and I've authenticated my Linux systems against it using Samba
>> Winbind. I've also installed Services for UNIX on my DCs to provide the
>> additions for UID/GID, homedir, shell, etc values. What is the "better"
>> solution; authenticate with Winbind, setup full-on Kerberos and LDAP
>> authentication, or use the NIS services that SFU provides?
>> SATLUG mailing list
>> SATLUG at satlug.org
>> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
>> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
> # Ernest De Leon
> "If Microsoft is 'flexible' it explains how their head got where it is."
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
More information about the SATLUG