[SATLUG] choosing a filesystem
Samuel Leon
leon36 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 4 11:15:18 CST 2007
http://fsbench.netnation.com/
http://fsbench.netnation.com/new_hardware/combined/iozone.html
Some info and benchmarks.
I really like ext2, but I everytime my desktop would lock up or I would
have to force it off I would loose a bunch of kde config files. Then I
would have to spend 2 hours editing everything to get my theme right
again. I switched to ext3 with journal_data_writeback and although the
file integrity is there, the writes are slow. A disc to disc copy would
normally pull 45m/Bs with ext2. With ext3 a disc to disc copy will
start out at 50m/Bs, but quickly fall down to 10m/Bs :(
Took me like almost 4 hours to copy 80gb of data the other night :-/
The more I read about filesystems, the more I realize there is not a
"jack of all trades".
Sam
Alex Bartonek wrote:
> I downloaded SuSE 10.2 and noticed the default fs is
> ext3. I currently use reiserfs and its served me
> well..I've "accidentally" powered off my system and
> others a few times only to have reiserfs save my hide.
> I've done some reading on reiser vs. ext3 vs. xfs etc
> but want to know if there are any stats on which is
> best for desktop use. (head to head comparison would
> be nice) For what I do..video editing would be the
> biggest hd hog, but I also run a VMWare session which
> is my webserver and another vm machine.
>
> Alex
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
More information about the SATLUG
mailing list