[SATLUG] ATT Thanks you

[Luis Garza]

The IP of the attacker was 69.153.198.255

I do admit that the 255 is odd.  I thought it was used for broadcasts and
such.

I just got off the phone with ATT.  My connects was down right after the
attack.  Imagen that!!!!

They think that it was a hardware problem on their end and that it
probibly was not related to the problems with my connection or the
outtages that occurred Sunday night. But they are going to check on it. 
They said that I would get a call back in a couple of days.



tom weeks wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 16:21, K. Spoon wrote:
>
>> And the fact that his gateway is also most likely in that range..... ?
>> :)
>
> Hey.. hey wanted secure.. ;)
>
> Really though.. I though that he stated that that IP was the attackers IP.
> (that's why I listed a /23 in case it was some supernet on the attacker's
> network).  Was it supposed to be some gateway of HIS?
>
> Luis?  What's the IP of the attacker?
>
> The same usage can block whatever single IP or range you wish:
> iptables -A INPUT -s  69.153.198.x -j DROP
>
>
> Tweeks
> --
> _______________________________________________
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
>


Luis Garza
www.luisgarza.com
luis at luisgarza.com
lrgarza2000 at yahoo.com