[SATLUG] ATT Thanks you

[Bruce Dubbs]

Luis Garza wrote:
> The IP of the attacker was 69.153.198.255
> 
> I do admit that the 255 is odd.  I thought it was used for broadcasts and
> such.

It depends on the netmask.  If it is, for example, a /23 network, then
all the addresses  69.153.198.1-69.153.199.254 are valid.

  -- Bruce