[SATLUG] Re:Satlug wifi
john mashl
jmashl at gmail.com
Sun Sep 2 19:50:54 CDT 2007
For your WiFi Acess in bandera you might try Hill country wireless
they should be able to help you out,
http://www.hwtx.com/
On 9/2/07, satlug-request at satlug.org <satlug-request at satlug.org> wrote:
> Send SATLUG mailing list submissions to
> satlug at satlug.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> satlug-request at satlug.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> satlug-owner at satlug.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SATLUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. sendmail logging (Leif Johnson)
> 2. RE: Setting up email server (Patrick P)
> 3. RE: Setting up email server (Patrick P)
> 4. Re: sendmail logging (Geoff)
> 5. RE: MP3 player (Glenn F. Boswell)
> 6. Portable mp3 players and linux (gboswell)
> 7. Re: Portable mp3 players and linux (Bruce Dubbs)
> 8. Re: Portable mp3 players and linux (Borries Demeler)
> 9. Wifi (Mary Yatti)
> 10. Re: Wifi (Geoff)
> 11. RE: Re: [SATLUG] Wifi (Bandera County) (scs at worldlinkisp.com)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:29:41 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Leif Johnson <leif at paisd.net>
> Subject: [SATLUG] sendmail logging
> To: satlug at satlug.org
> Message-ID:
> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0709021154540.1106 at croaker.port-aransas.k12.tx.us>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
>
> I've tested my mailserver (sendmail-8.14.1-4.1.fc6) for open relay and the
> report says I'm not open. Fine. I have my /etc/mail/access file limited to
> relay from localhost only:
>
> # by default we allow relaying from localhost...
> localhost.localdomain RELAY
> localhost RELAY
> 127.0.0.1 RELAY
>
> Yet I keep seeing entries such as this in my maillog:
>
> Sep 2 11:40:35 mobydick sendmail[26541]: l82GLnJe026541: lost input
> channel from [219.248.195.170] to MTA after data
> Sep 2 11:40:35 mobydick sendmail[26541]: l82GLnJe026541:
> from=<alelu at pisem.net>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP,
> daemon=MTA, relay=[219.248.195.170]
> Sep 2 11:41:04 mobydick sendmail[26539]: l82GLn2v026539: lost input
> channel from [219.248.195.170] to MTA after data
> Sep 2 11:41:04 mobydick sendmail[26539]: l82GLn2v026539:
> from=<kaluga at white-cat.com>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP,
> daemon=MTA, relay=[219.248.195.170]
>
> Can someone tell me if those are just bounces or does this indicate that
> my mailserver is being used as a relay of some sort?
>
> Sincerely,
> -Leif Johnson
> Port Aransas ISD
> 100 Station St
> Port Aransas Tx 78373
> 361 749-1200 ext. 316
> http://blog.paisd.net
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:04:35 -0500
> From: Patrick P <parspe at hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [SATLUG] Setting up email server
> To: <satlug at satlug.org>
> Message-ID: <BAY105-W22C576CD883F6CC0DB669ACAC80 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I would define "secure" by the number of vulnerabilities forund in an application over time, unless it was an application which was not widely used.
> Does it need updating? Perhaps it has not been updated because there were no bugs to fix. There are only 3 reasons I can think of for updating an application.
> 1) New functionality
> 2) Bug fixes
> 3) Incompatibilty with new versions of libraries used by the application.
> Yes, most certainly the license would have to be evaluated for your situation.
>
> I wouldn't call that "secure", nor would I consider that to be
> desirable in an environment where you are likely to actually care
> about things like the license you have to agree to for the software
> you're going to use.
> _________________________________________________________________
> News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
> http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:06:47 -0500
> From: Patrick P <parspe at hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [SATLUG] Setting up email server
> To: <satlug at satlug.org>
> Message-ID: <BAY105-W454C474E7CA368331E0FECAC80 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I would not consider Beta as functional for most applications.
>
> Squirrelmail is SLOW if you have people with large inboxes (1000+
> messages). I'd look at Roundcube (http://roundcube.net/). It's beta
> but functional.
>
> Robert
> _________________________________________________________________
> Discover the new Windows Vista
> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:06:06 -0500
> From: Geoff <geoff at w5omr.shacknet.nu>
> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] sendmail logging
> To: "The San Antonio Linux User's Group Mailing List"
> <satlug at satlug.org>
> Message-ID: <46DAFB8E.1070703 at w5omr.shacknet.nu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Leif Johnson wrote:
> >
> > I've tested my mailserver (sendmail-8.14.1-4.1.fc6) for open relay and
> > the report says I'm not open. Fine. I have my /etc/mail/access file
> > limited to relay from localhost only:
> >
> > # by default we allow relaying from localhost...
> > localhost.localdomain RELAY
> > localhost RELAY
> > 127.0.0.1 RELAY
> >
> > Yet I keep seeing entries such as this in my maillog:
> >
> > Sep 2 11:40:35 mobydick sendmail[26541]: l82GLnJe026541: lost input
> > channel from [219.248.195.170] to MTA after data
> > Sep 2 11:40:35 mobydick sendmail[26541]: l82GLnJe026541:
> > from=<alelu at pisem.net>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP,
> > daemon=MTA, relay=[219.248.195.170]
> > Sep 2 11:41:04 mobydick sendmail[26539]: l82GLn2v026539: lost input
> > channel from [219.248.195.170] to MTA after data
> > Sep 2 11:41:04 mobydick sendmail[26539]: l82GLn2v026539:
> > from=<kaluga at white-cat.com>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP,
> > daemon=MTA, relay=[219.248.195.170]
> >
> > Can someone tell me if those are just bounces or does this indicate
> > that my mailserver is being used as a relay of some sort?
>
> Someone's -trying- to use you as a relay. Did you ping 'white-cat.com'
> and see what you come up with?
>
> PING white-cat.com (89.253.245.50) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from mnogomag.ru (89.253.245.50): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=190 ms
>
> a whois on the 219.248.195.170 address comes back with
>
> KRNIC is not an ISP but a National Internet Registry similar to APNIC.
> The followings is organization information that is using the IPv4 address.
>
> IPv4 Address : 219.248.195.0-219.248.195.255
> Network Name : HANANET-INFRA
> Connect ISP Name : HANANET
> Connect Date : 20030325
> Registration Date : 20041014
> Publishes : Y
>
> [ Organization Information ]
> Organization ID : ORG3930
> Org Name : Hanaro Telecom Inc.
> Address : Yeoeuido-dong Yeongdeungpo-gu SEOUL
> Detail address : 17-7 Asia One Bldg.
> Zip Code : 150-874
>
> [ Technical Contact Information ]
> Name : IP manager
> Org Name : Hanaro Telecom Inc.
> Address : Yeoeuido-dong Yeongdeungpo-gu SEOUL
> Detail address : 17-7 Asia One Bldg.
> Zip Code : 150-874
> Phone : +82-2-106-2
> E-Mail : ip-adm at hanaro.com
>
> someone is -trying-, but are probably not very successful.
>
> --
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:25:13 -0500
> From: "Glenn F. Boswell" <gboswell at accd.edu>
> Subject: [SATLUG] RE: MP3 player
> To: bruce.dubbs at gmail.com, satlug at satlug.org
> Message-ID: <46DB0009.2070205 at accd.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Bruce I sent a reply to satlug on this last night from another box
> (windows) , apparently did not take.
> I have a T10 and T30 from iriver which plays mp3, OGG + all the
> other formats. The T30 512mb was < $30 and the T10 128mb was < $20
> on ebay. The T10 came with a runners arm holder that could also hold
> the T30. Both came with usb cable and nice (sound) head sets. I also
> have some "china" 1 GB and 2GB mp3 players that were so bad I only use
> them for usb storage. I also have the manual for the T30 that has more
> info than I care to understand. Come by SAC and borrow them both to
> see if either would meet your needs. I also have a Achros 20GB player
> but jogging would cause it to skip. The ipod (6 GB sticks) work well but
> they really price them up there. Call me if you want more info.
>
> Boz
>
> --
> Glenn Boswell "Boz" gboswell at accd.edu
> San Antonio College Dept. CIS (210)-733-2866
> "We make a living by what we Get.
> We make a LIFE by what we GIVE." anonymous
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:23:31 -0500
> From: gboswell <gboswell at accd.edu>
> Subject: [SATLUG] Portable mp3 players and linux
> To: satlug at satlug.org
> Message-ID: <46DA3AC3.8020706 at accd.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in finding a relatively inexpensive portable mp3 player
> > for jogging and walking. I really don't know much about the hardware
> > players. I know that the .mp3 format is a compressed audio format
> > (actually misnamed because the format is MPEG 1 Level 3, not MPEG 3).
> >
> > I see that I can create .mp3 files from .wav files with LAME and can
> > download free (or not) .mp3 files from the internet. I can rip a CD I
> > own to .wav files with cdparanoia. All this means that I really don't
> > have a problem getting the content.
> >
> > The functionality of a mp3 player would seem to me to be fairly simple.
> > I was looking at the store today and saw several players. My question
> > is how can I manage the .mp3 files on the portable player with linux?
> > Is is as simple as mounting via usb or firewire (IEEE 1394) or is there
> > something else?
> >
> > I'm not really interested in an ipod because it seems to be too
> > expensive, but there do seem to be some players in the $40 range
> > available. Any recommendations would be appreciated.
> >
> > -- Bruce
> Bruce I use iriver, cheap < $30.00 for 512m, great headphones (sound
> wise) , can play mp3, OGG (open source, I know you knew that but others
> might not), plus WMA, ASF plus others. The T10 came with a arm adapter
> for running and the T30 would work with it also. Come borrow both of
> them and see if they will work for you. Both have usb cables etc. I have
> the manual for the T30. I also have some of the China 2GB units but
> use them for usb storage devices as the music is less than great even
> with different headphones.
>
> Boz
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:44:31 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] Portable mp3 players and linux
> To: "The San Antonio Linux User's Group Mailing List"
> <satlug at satlug.org>
> Message-ID: <46DB048F.5040402 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> gboswell wrote:
> >
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> >> I'm interested in finding a relatively inexpensive portable mp3 player
> >> for jogging and walking. I really don't know much about the hardware
> >> players. I know that the .mp3 format is a compressed audio format
> >> (actually misnamed because the format is MPEG 1 Level 3, not MPEG 3).
> >>
> >> I see that I can create .mp3 files from .wav files with LAME and can
> >> download free (or not) .mp3 files from the internet. I can rip a CD I
> >> own to .wav files with cdparanoia. All this means that I really don't
> >> have a problem getting the content.
> >>
> >> The functionality of a mp3 player would seem to me to be fairly simple.
> >> I was looking at the store today and saw several players. My question
> >> is how can I manage the .mp3 files on the portable player with linux?
> >> Is is as simple as mounting via usb or firewire (IEEE 1394) or is there
> >> something else?
> >>
> >> I'm not really interested in an ipod because it seems to be too
> >> expensive, but there do seem to be some players in the $40 range
> >> available. Any recommendations would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> -- Bruce
> > Bruce I use iriver, cheap < $30.00 for 512m, great headphones (sound
> > wise) , can play mp3, OGG (open source, I know you knew that but others
> > might not), plus WMA, ASF plus others. The T10 came with a arm adapter
> > for running and the T30 would work with it also. Come borrow both of
> > them and see if they will work for you. Both have usb cables etc. I have
> > the manual for the T30. I also have some of the China 2GB units but
> > use them for usb storage devices as the music is less than great even
> > with different headphones.
>
> Thanks to all that have posted info on this. I think I can find the
> appropriate device from the info given.
>
> SATLUG comes through again.
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:45:30 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Borries Demeler <demeler at biochem.uthscsa.edu>
> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] Portable mp3 players and linux
> To: satlug at satlug.org
> Message-ID: <200709021845.l82IjUBg026677 at biochem.uthscsa.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Bruce,
>
> I bought a couple of SanDisc players for cheap. They also come with FM radio
> which I use a lot while biking. I replaced the earbuds with some decent
> Sennheiser headphones (more expensive than the player), but that investment
> was well worth it. They are more comfortable and the sound is excellent,
> even when riding + windnoise. I rip my daughter's CDs for her player to
> MP3 and everything she owns fits on there comfortably in MP3 format.
>
> I also often download mp3 encoded radio shows and listen to those when
> there is nothing on the radio. The USB use is really as easy as plugging it
> in and copying to the device. It will come up just like another sd* drive
> that you can mount to any directory and then copy to it.
>
> -Borries
> >
> >
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> > I'm interested in finding a relatively inexpensive portable mp3 player
> > for jogging and walking. I really don't know much about the hardware
> > players. I know that the .mp3 format is a compressed audio format
> > (actually misnamed because the format is MPEG 1 Level 3, not MPEG 3).
> >
> > I see that I can create .mp3 files from .wav files with LAME and can
> > download free (or not) .mp3 files from the internet. I can rip a CD I
> > own to .wav files with cdparanoia. All this means that I really don't
> > have a problem getting the content.
> >
> > The functionality of a mp3 player would seem to me to be fairly simple.
> > I was looking at the store today and saw several players. My question
> > is how can I manage the .mp3 files on the portable player with linux?
> > Is is as simple as mounting via usb or firewire (IEEE 1394) or is there
> > something else?
> >
> > I'm not really interested in an ipod because it seems to be too
> > expensive, but there do seem to be some players in the $40 range
> > available. Any recommendations would be appreciated.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mary Yatti <yatinhat at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [SATLUG] Wifi
> To: satlug at satlug.org
> Message-ID: <604855.86374.qm at web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Thanks to everyone who supplied info on wifi hotspot
> setup. I don't know why, but this south central texas
> sucks in finding free wifi hotspots. When in Austin
> or Houston..it's never a problem.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:27:32 -0500
> From: Geoff <geoff at w5omr.shacknet.nu>
> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] Wifi
> To: "The San Antonio Linux User's Group Mailing List"
> <satlug at satlug.org>
> Message-ID: <46DB0EA4.4020301 at w5omr.shacknet.nu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Mary Yatti wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone who supplied info on wifi hotspot
> > setup. I don't know why, but this south central texas
> > sucks in finding free wifi hotspots. When in Austin
> > or Houston..it's never a problem.
> >
>
> you never answered my question, Mary...
>
> Is there such a thing as high-speed access to the internet in Bandera,
> *other* than via satellite?
>
> --
> -Geoff
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 17:07:16 -0400
> From: "scs at worldlinkisp.com" <scs at worldlinkisp.com>
> Subject: RE: Re: [SATLUG] Wifi (Bandera County)
> To: satlug at satlug.org
> Message-ID: <c6d67eba67954d658af3cfaba5b5646e.scs at worldlinkisp.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> >------- Original Message -------
> >From : Geoff wrote:
> Is there such a thing as high-speed access to the
> internet in Bandera, *other* than via satellite?
> ---------------------------------------------
> Yes, depending on your definition of high-speed.
> There's wireless dsl @ about 1.5 ~ 2.3 kbs from
> Indian Creek 730-796-7788
> Internet America 800-232-4335
>
> Lou
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug
> Powered by Rackspace (http://rackspace.com)
>
> End of SATLUG Digest, Vol 44, Issue 8
> *************************************
>
More information about the SATLUG
mailing list