[SATLUG] Reversing Loss, Microsoft Wins Open-Format Designation
Jonathan Hull
masterr at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 09:33:01 CDT 2008
More news on this this morning.
http://news.slashdot.org/news/08/04/03/1318247.shtml
Seems that the EU is investigating and that the decision is being
appeal. Lets hope this gets reversed.
-Jon
On 4/2/08, Jonathan Hull <masterr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dang. I was hoping that story was just an April Fool's joke.
>
> With all the known corruption and consistencies in the voting I hope
> this gets investigated and reversed, but judging by ISO's reputation
> sadly that probably won't happen... grrrr. This is the worst
> "standard" they could have approved.
>
> -Jon
>
>
>
> On 4/2/08, Borries Demeler <demeler at biochem.uthscsa.edu> wrote:
> > In today's New York Times...what is this, let's vote until we get the
> > result we want? This doesn't look good for OpenOffice being accepted as
> > the standard.
> > -b.
> >
> > ****************************************************************************
> > Reversing Loss, Microsoft Wins Open-Format Designation
> >
> > By KEVIN J. O'BRIEN
> > Published: April 2, 2008
> >
> > Microsoft has won an international standards designation for its
> > open-document format, according to voting results obtained Tuesday,
> > apparently ending a divisive yearlong battle with software rivals before
> > a global standards-setting organization.
> >
> > Microsoft's Office Open XML, a format for interchangeable Web documents,
> > was approved by 24 of 32 countries in a core group in a ballot by
> > the International Organization for Standardization. Approval by the
> > standards-setting body, a nongovernmental network of 157 countries based
> > in Geneva, is considered almost certain to influence software spending
> > by governments and large companies.
> >
> > The tally reversed a loss by Microsoft in first-round voting before an
> > 87-nation panel in September, a process that involved blunt lobbying by
> > both sides toward members of national standards committees - typically
> > made up of technicians, engineers and bureaucrats.
> >
> > In the final round of voting, which ended Saturday, three-quarters of the
> > core group members - including Britain, Japan, Germany and Switzerland -
> > supported Microsoft's standard, according to the results document. Of
> > the 87 votes, 10 opposed the standard: Brazil, Canada, China, Cuba,
> > Ecuador, India, Iran, New Zealand, South Africa and Venezuela.
> >
> > Under organization rules, at least 66 percent of core group members must
> > accept a standard for it to be approved, and no more than 25 percent of
> > all voting nations can be opposed.
> >
> > Roger Frost, a spokesman in Geneva for the standardization group,
> > would not confirm that Microsoft's format had been designated, saying
> > the organization would disclose the vote Wednesday after informing its
> > members. The International Herald Tribune obtained the results from one
> > of the delegations contacted by the standardization group.
> >
> > Microsoft's request for rapid approval of its standard in early 2007
> > produced an intense lobbying campaign by I.B.M. and Sun Microsystems,
> > which had helped develop a rival interchangeable document format called
> > Open Document Format.
> >
> > This rival was the first interchangeable document format to receive
> > approval by the standardization group in 2006, and its backers used that
> > in selling the technology to governments and large companies. The format
> > is now being considered for use by 70 nations.
> >
> > Microsoft's push for speedy approval led to objections from many members
> > of the standards group. They felt pressure from the company, whose Office
> > application suite is the standard on more than 90 percent of computers and
> > archives worldwide, according to International Data in Framingham, Mass.
> >
> > There were tart remarks even from countries that abstained from the
> > vote, like the Netherlands. "This is like someone with six shopping
> > carts of food trying to go through the express lane at a supermarket,"
> > said Michiel Leenaars, a member of the Dutch delegation. "The end result
> > of this will be confusion. The standard is simply too big. There are
> > still a lot of questions out there."
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > SATLUG mailing list
> > SATLUG at satlug.org
> > http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> > Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
> >
>
More information about the SATLUG
mailing list