[SATLUG] culture question
Todd W. Bucy
toddwbucy at grandecom.net
Mon Aug 4 09:56:55 CDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 09:53 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 09:34 -0500, Todd W. Bucy wrote:
> > I am currently writting a paper comaring F/OSS gift economics to that of
> > the Iroquian Wampum system of the 15th and 16th centuries (also a gift
> > economy). I will not go into all the gory details of my argument, as it
> > largely does not pertain to Linux. I wrote something that has the ring
> > of "truthiness" and would like to have the communitites opinion on the
> > matter. comment follows:
> > "...code that is noted as being “elegant” often requires very little in
> > the way of comments...code which contains to many comments is often
> > thought of as being 'over-designed'..."
> > I would like to know if this is generally true within the hacker
> > community. I am by no means a hacker and I am very warry of making such
> > a statement without some confirmation.
> I don't know that this is an accurate statement. While I am much more
> of a sysadmin type than a coder, every professional programmer with whom
> I've worked has always told me to comment my code. You don't have to go
> nuts, just enough to make clear what you're tying to do.
> It's not necessarily for others who will see your code, although that's
> important... It's just as much as for yourself so when you have to
> change something after a while you can remember what you've done.
yeah this is what struck me as "truthy". Although I have heard that
code which is elegant requires little in the way of comments. Is this
generally true? or is it another "truthy" statement?
More information about the SATLUG