[SATLUG] culture question

Todd W. Bucy toddwbucy at grandecom.net
Mon Aug 4 09:56:55 CDT 2008

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 09:53 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 09:34 -0500, Todd W. Bucy wrote:
> > I am currently writting a paper comaring F/OSS gift economics to that of
> > the Iroquian Wampum system of the 15th and 16th centuries (also a gift
> > economy).  I will not go into all the gory details of my argument, as it
> > largely does not pertain to Linux.  I wrote something that has the ring
> > of "truthiness" and would like to have the communitites opinion on the
> > matter.  comment follows:
> > 
> > "...code that is noted as being “elegant” often requires very little in
> > the way of comments...code which contains to many comments is often
> > thought of as being 'over-designed'..."
> > 
> > I would like to know if this is generally true within the hacker
> > community.  I am by no means a hacker and I am very warry of making such
> > a statement without some confirmation.
> I don't know that this is an accurate statement.  While I am much more
> of a sysadmin type than a coder, every professional programmer with whom
> I've worked has always told me to comment my code.  You don't have to go
> nuts, just enough to make clear what you're tying to do.  
> It's not necessarily for others who will see your code, although that's
> important...  It's just as much as for yourself so when you have to
> change something after a while you can remember what you've done.
> Thomas
yeah this is what struck me as "truthy".  Although I have heard that
code which is elegant requires little in the way of comments.  Is this
generally true? or is it another "truthy" statement?


More information about the SATLUG mailing list