[SATLUG] Automatix use with Ubuntu
Todd W. Bucy
toddwbucy at grandecom.net
Thu Jan 3 00:49:53 CST 2008
I have used both for a while now with no problem. Synaptic is great if
you know what your looking for. Automatix is helpful if you don't.
Ernest De Leon wrote:
> I would recommend sticking with synaptic. It is a plenty powerful and
> stable package manager. Let's put it this way, with synaptic, you can't go
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:29 PM, herb cee <hc at lookcee.com> wrote:
>> Does anyone use this. The FAQ has this where my concern lies.
>> Does Automatix2 break Ubuntu upgrades?
>> * The chances of Automatix being behind the breaking of a Ubuntu
>> upgrade is as high as the packages which Ubuntu releases for that
>> release and the subsequent one. Most of what Automatix installs
>> comes directly from the Ubuntu repositories and is installed using
>> apt-get (just like in synaptic and Add/Remove). It is more likely
>> that an upgrade problem lies upstream in the Ubuntu repositories.
>> In fact Ubuntu has been notorious for breaking xserver packages
>> several times on stable releases in the past. They have also been
>> extremely notorious for passing on the blame to Automatix for
>> their own failings (which they still haven't stopped doing). It is
>> unfortunate that many people actually believe in this FUD and help
>> spread it even further rather than trying to investigate the real
>> cause of a breakage."
>> It leaves me sceptically concerned but looks nice. I would appreciate
>> some comments from users. I like the way Ubuntu offers updating control
>> with Synaptic so I do not want to damage or even hamper that feature.
>> Since April I have only had one package break with an update and it was
>> one I was not using so removing it cured the hangup.
>> Thanks herb
>> SATLUG mailing list
>> SATLUG at satlug.org
>> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
>> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
More information about the SATLUG