[SATLUG] lvm2 and raid 0

John Pappas j at jvpappas.net
Sun Jan 6 08:43:49 CST 2008

On Jan 5, 2008 3:27 PM, Chris Lemire <good_bye300 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Raid 0 has the risk of data corruption that usually happens after a
> certain amount of time. Is using LVM2 for striping safer than raid 0?

No.  Just more flexible.  LVM does not infer redundant, as you must keep
copies of data in order to provide a spare in the case of failure.

More information about the SATLUG mailing list