[SATLUG] This list Linux/Political
Ernest De Leon
edeleonjr at gmail.com
Tue Jan 8 13:35:26 CST 2008
Is there a minimum criteria for a 'flame war' such as 3 subsequent replies
from opposing parties?
On Jan 8, 2008 11:33 AM, Todd W. Bucy <toddwbucy at grandecom.net> wrote:
> Jeremy Mann wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 1:17 PM, Todd W. Bucy <toddwbucy at grandecom.net> wrote:
> >> Maybe, given that its an election year we should consider resurrecting
> >> SATLUG -ETC. Someone wishing to discuss off-topic issues can take it
> >> there. If a person consistently violates the list rules of discourse
> >> under such a circumstance I could see banning someone. Banning though
> >> should be a last resort and the community as a whole should have some
> >> say in the process.
> > Todd, I don't think this has anything to do with the election year.
> > The last flame war I remember was a few months ago, about a celebrity
> > or something. I forgot what exactly it was. Geoff can chime in since
> > he probably remembers. A few months from now it'll be because of
> > something completely different. And it goes on and on. Its usually
> > from the same people so I'm all for banning those certain individuals.
> > Remember guys/gals, there are probably employers who monitor and
> > participate on this list.
> the last flame war was just last week. you can read it in its full
> evolution from a slightly legitimate topic into an all out flame war
> under the topic of "Man arrested for copying his own CDs"
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety. - A common 18th Century sentiment
voiced by Benjamin Franklin
Join the Ron Paul Revolution - Taking America Back
More information about the SATLUG