[SATLUG] Sustainable IT

Ernest De Leon edeleonjr at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 21:23:57 CST 2008

Definitely true Tom.  I also notice that on my laptops, Linux usually has
better battery life than windows.  Aside from certain enterprise integration
points (for collaboration), there really is no case to use Microsoft
products at all.  There are also some solid OSS collaboration platforms out
there, so there's always a case where OSS can shine.


On Jan 15, 2008 7:10 PM, Tom Weeks <tweeksjunk2 at theweeks.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 18:53:49 Brian Lewis wrote:
> > I'd like to see the numbers you used to make a claim that Linux and XP
> > are "greener" than vista.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong I'm 100% MS free, but a claim like this is quote
> > inane without providing facts and numbers.
> I don't know about vista.. but in some of my OS/thermal tests... Linux has
> always run cooler than windows in general (separate from frequency scaling
> features in such).  I'm not sure if it's the difference between the linux
> and
> windows kernel or schedulers, but the CPU is definitely more lightly
> loaded
> at idle (continuously) in Linux than it is in Windows.
> Tweeks
> --
> _______________________________________________
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.  - A common 18th Century sentiment
voiced by Benjamin Franklin

Join the Ron Paul Revolution - Taking America Back

More information about the SATLUG mailing list