[SATLUG] Re: mobile devices with linux

KC kcoriginal at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 29 20:10:53 CDT 2008

Geez Brad, you were doing SOOOO well... you lost me at 99.999999999999999999998% or whatever that dramatic ultra liberal statement was. Sheesh.

I skipped a whole email from earlier where you were off in ultra left field... ok

this is good... this ireally good. 

Thank-you for spending so much time on good clean dialog.

There is hope for world peace, yet!

You lost me at the 99.99999blahblahblah comment... but otherwise, I just learned a lot from you. Thanks again. I forgot about Avid and other details of Mac history. I give you mad props for the knowledge of your Macs.

This thread has come a long way since noon today.

Good job.

Definitely agree with you on the Adobe front, NOW. Not when they jumped ship. When they jumped, Apple was just as difficult to collaborate with as they ever were... in the face of a HUGE profit market and a then recently-extinct hardware inequality, they made the logical choice. They realized they were a bigger name in the "here and now" of their day than Mac was. It wasnt Macs reputation, or history that kept them afloat when Adobe defected, it was their coasting as you referred to before. They lived off their own fat whilst inventing the next big visionary thing. The iPod and then the iPhone. 

This is good. Nice therapy. You have turned out to be a reasonable fella, after all!

(I can't believe I got sucked into this... nice trolling btw... ever been fishing? If I had a boat I'd invite you, man... and we could b!tch about this all day over some beers... LOL)

--- On Tue, 7/29/08, Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org> wrote:

> From: Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org>
> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] Re: mobile devices with linux
> To: "The San Antonio Linux User's Group Mailing List" <satlug at satlug.org>
> Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2008, 5:07 PM
> KC wrote:
> > actually... if you think about it... it's kind of
> amazing that they
> > rebounded like they did.  They were nearly dead. What
> kept them alive?
> Steve Jobs and the original iMac.  After the iMac glow
> faded, it was Steve 
> Jobs and the iPod.  Now that the iPod is fading, it looks
> like it's going to 
> be Steve Jobs and the iPhone.
> > Brad? What kept Apple alive in the 90's? I guess
> they resurged on the
> > iMac... blueberry and grape and all... but was it
> Hollywood ALONE that
> > supported them since the black and white Macs of the
> late 80's??
> No, not Hollywood.  Most any graphics or media production
> group was always 
> very heavy with Macs, after whatever proprietary hardware
> they were required 
> to have as a part of their business.
> So, non-linear video editing was done on Avid workstations,
> but they used 
> Macs for most everything else.  Later, you could do a lot
> of simpler rough 
> NLE on Macs, and you might have to reserve time in the
> hyper-expensive Avid 
> suites for only the higher-end stuff.
> And Apple had a tight relationship with the press industry
> going back long 
> before video editing.
> >                                                       
>            What
> > else kept the company in existence through the 5-10
> years between those
> > and the late 90's iMac come-back?
> For a while, they were able to coast on their previous
> achievements.  The 
> Mac Clone era happened during this time.
> But they didn't really start turning around until Steve
> Jobs came back, 
> whacked off huge mucking parts of the company (and
> associated industry) and 
> forced the remainder to have a laser-tight focus on their
> real business. 
> That's when the original iMac was born.
> >                                                       
>     Adobe gained
> > their notoriety on Apple's platform, but
> Apple's A.S. was cutting their
> > potential so... Adobe chose the superior platform to
> deal with, from a
> > business perspective, and now its from a hardware
> perspective as well,
> > Wintel.
> I think Adobe has finally figured out that they really shot
> themselves in 
> the foot with a thermonuclear device, and they can pretty
> much kiss off the 
> entire press/pre-press and computer graphics markets --
> those have all gone 
> commodity/mass-market, and they can't make their kinds
> of profits they 
> require on low-end commodity/mass-market software.
> They're now chasing the interactive multimedia market
> through Flash, 
> although I don't think they have yet found a way to
> make a profit in this 
> market.
> > the iPod came out of nowhere, then the iPhone, but the
> Mac is holding on
> > only in the trendy upper class study's that I used
> to service PC's and
> > electronics in... might be the upper crust, but the
> volume is nowehre
> > near enough to support them without the iPod and
> iPhone...
> Apple's Mac business has been picking up steam over the
> years, and they're 
> in better position now than they have been in the previous
> decade since.
> Besides, no one talks about BMW dying because they
> don't own 
> 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%
> of the market.
> I think people are finally starting to realize that
> it's okay to have more 
> than one company in this business, and that the smaller
> companies can still 
> live, continue to grow, and to even thrive with a smaller
> marketshare.
> -- 
> Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org>
> LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to
> unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)

More information about the SATLUG mailing list