[SATLUG] Apologies and olive branches.

John Chalinder argiod at bresnan.net
Sat Mar 22 01:40:19 CDT 2008

The tagging system sounds good to me. You've got my vote. Anything to keep 
this forum on topic and sensible.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:31:43 -0500
  ed <horned0wl93 at gmail.com> wrote:
> What started as a Puppy thread, and got expanded into robotics, a la
> BigDog, is now drowning in multi-threaded muck.  There's now more being
> said about what can or should, cannot or should not, be said in the list
> than there is about any particular topic, on-, loosely- or off-topic.
> I've checked, and I've either taken the lead, of provided first support
> for each of the four major divergences from the original topic.  For
> those, I apologize, and ask that we reign-in what looks to become a
> genuine, list-splitting flame war real soon.  Help?
> I think the suggestion of marking a topic [OT] at the beginning of a
> divergence, with a (was ""), is probably a good idea.  Thereby allowing
> those who wish to pursue it, while those who don't, including list
> "purists," can either race by or filter it out.  Can we get a consensus
> here?  Please?
> Cheers;
> Ed
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)

More information about the SATLUG mailing list