[SATLUG] OT: a typical grad student question
argiod at bresnan.net
Fri Mar 28 12:37:18 CDT 2008
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:32:16 -0600
"John Chalinder" <argiod at bresnan.net> wrote:
>> one final question, in part this question touches on another...given
>> that google is said to keep everything, Is this true? it seems to me
>> that this is true and it is also true that the amount of data on the
>> Internet is growing exponentially the it stands to reason that they will
>> eventually run out of archival space. (Finite resources and all) How is
>> google addressing this issue? Do they eventually destroy old data to
>> make room for new or are they hoping that eventually technology will be
>> able to address the problem though more efficient use of resources (i.e.
>> building better archival storage which allows for greater data density)?
>> I suspect that the answer is the latter?
> In answer to the final question about Google's storage methods: whatever
>method and media they use is probably the least expensive they can find. The
>secret to their longevity is probably more to do with regular backups to
>fresh media. Most sites that keep 'sensitive' data stored keep the last three
>backups, so if one goes bad, nothing is lost. Also, some sites keep multiple
>copies of backups, with some of the copies stored offsite, in case of a
>disaster at the main facility. In this manner, the longevity of the media is
>not an issue, so long as they are in business and keep the backup cycle
Also, with the advent of nanotechnology, memory is now able to store 32GB of
data on a USB flash drive. Storage media is shrinking fast. Soon, perhaps all
my data will be stored on an RFID chip the size of a grain of rice, embedded
in my skull, hooked up to a nano scale quantum computer with wireless
interface and virtual keyboard projected as a 'heads up display' directly
wired to my retinas.
More information about the SATLUG