[SATLUG] OT - AT&T - DSL and Uverse

HAYES DENNIS mhayes59 at sbcglobal.net
Sat Nov 15 12:35:56 CST 2008

I had uverse. What I did like about it was that it seemed to give a better picture. There DSL was fine for everthing I did. I did not have digital phone service with them stayed with POTS did no like the fact that when cable was down phone was down. The only trouble we had was the picture kept freezing up. Got to know several techs by first name. I will say that there tech service is great, they give you a 2 hour window and usually are early. Changed back to TW cable only due to the savings for the next year. AT&T could not match price.

--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Sean I <siffland at nerdshack.com> wrote:

From: Sean I <siffland at nerdshack.com>
Subject: [SATLUG] OT - AT&T - DSL and Uverse
To: "Satlug" <satlug at satlug.org>
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 10:14 AM

I am finally fed up with time Warner, my bill keeps increasing and i
call them every month and they take stuff off but it is getting old.
I was thinking about DSL (yeah i know slower but still works).  There
were a few guys here about 2 weeks ago peddling Uverse for at&t, said
i was one of the only houses in the neighborhood that could get it
(which i doubt but i played along).  I remember some people on this
list shunning uverse and telling of the badness of it, could they
reiterate on it so i have some more information.  If i do go to AT&T
is it better to get the uverse stuff or straight DSL, or do i have a
choice?  I would just like to hear from people who have it before i
make a decision (this will effect my phone and cable too, when i leave
a service i leave it all).  Of course the two blokes peddling the
uverse were explaining to me how their 10GB fiber backbone was faster
than roadrunner 15Gb backbone, made me wonder if i was just going

SATLUG mailing list
SATLUG at satlug.org
http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to unsubscribe
Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)

More information about the SATLUG mailing list