[SATLUG] RAID5 Recovery - Reassembly looking good!!! :+)

Samuel Leon satlug at net153.net
Thu Aug 27 00:05:19 CDT 2009

Forgot to mention, I am still not sure if there will be any 
repercussions for upgrading libc6 the way that we did.  (we installed 
the libc6 from jaunty into intrepid).  Maybe someone else on here might 
know more about this.  Looking on the net all I see is that it "is not a 
good idea".  Not sure if anything bad will happen though.  I would keep 
an eye on it and make sure after everything is done that the server can 
restart and boot up alright.


David Labens wrote:
> Will do.  THANK YOU!
> David Labens
> San Antonio, TX
> --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Samuel Leon <satlug at net153.net> wrote:
> From: Samuel Leon <satlug at net153.net>
> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] RAID5 Recovery - Reassembly looking good!!! :+)
> To: "The San Antonio Linux User's Group Mailing List" <satlug at satlug.org>
> Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 11:57 PM
> Awesome.  Yes just let it sit there and do its thing.  I think you can get better stats and an eta with: cat /proc/mdstat
> Just keep /dev/md0 unmounted until you are ready to run the fsck ( and keep it unmounted during the fsck too)
> Sam
> David Labens wrote:
>> root at RCH-SERVER:/# mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1
>> mdadm: re-added /dev/sdb1
>> You said to let the file system re-sync.  So, I checked with:
>> root at RCH-SERVER:/# mdadm -D /dev/md0

More information about the SATLUG mailing list