[SATLUG] Virtualization Platform (Proxmox)

jaret jaret at aberlorn.com
Sat Oct 3 17:00:11 CDT 2009

Todd W. Bucy wrote:
> looks interesting, like an open source version of VMware.  KVM with a 
> gui?  

There are two virtual technologies involved and you pick which one you 
want to use on a new VM creation. One virtualization type is Open VZ and 
the other is KVM - which is full virtualization. I've been experimenting 
with the KVM side and last night on my i7, I installed Ubuntu 9.04 
desktop as a Virtual Machine and the install significantly less time 
than a regular install on hardware. I'm using proxmox 1.4 beta 2, with 
all the i7 drivers compiled in. Booting the Ubuntu VM took 5 seconds - 
tops. I'm going to install windows and see what happens now.

I'm blown away right now at the speed differences between my two test 
machines - both i7s and both using KVM full virtualization.  One i7 has 
proxmox and the second i7 I had loaded with Ubuntu 9.04 desktop and sudo 
apt-get install libvirt kvm and all the needed packaged programs and 
then configuring everything from the command-line. The desktop is using 
qcow2 non-LVM disk files as the VM storage system whereas proxmox uses 
lvm under "raw" format (qcow2 was an option but I decided to try raw to 
see what that was about).  Anyway I'm trying to make sense of the speed 
differences. I think proxmox was compiled specifically with speed in 
mind whereas the desktop version is not. Also using LVM is significantly 
faster than file-based vms.


More information about the SATLUG mailing list