[SATLUG] Need a +1/-1 vote on monthly meetings at Rackspace

r3d91ll r3d91ll at grandecom.net
Tue Dec 28 09:15:51 CST 2010


I voted against as the only difference between SAC and Rackspace is the
soda fountain.  Also at SAC we are in a position to interest more
students in our organization

On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 16:33 -0600, Thomas Weeks wrote:
> <Local LUG geek hat>
> Ok folks... we've been debating this for weeks now.  We've all heard the 
> pros/cons for moving SATLUG meetings to Rackspace (XCSSA already voted to move 
> several weeks ago).. Can we each just reply with an +1/-1 vote?  
> Not to fan the coals of the monthly SATLUG-TPBP debate, but for this purpose.. 
> please top post your vote so that we can get a quick/accurate count. ;)
> Besides the two open issues below.. if anyone else has any additional 
> thoughts, please include them BELOW your +1/-1 vote.
> <Racker rep hat>
> Hey Howard/Don.. 
> On the future SATLUG meetings at Rackspace vote; Can you all get a count (if 
> you feel all the questions have been addressed) and get back with John and I? 
> >From what I've read, the two semi-open issues are:
> 	* Having dedicated rackers to assist with building access
> 	* Streamlining remaining parking access process
> On the dedicated-racker-bodies side for building access.. I think that John 
> and I are setting up an internal Rackspace mail list (with around a dozen 
> internal Racker volunteers) that you or anyone can send to to verify 
> people/resource availability (or ask for help) with regards to building 
> access.  The thinking here is that the week before a meeting, the meeting 
> announcement would be CCd to this list (to announce and request the 
> resources)... and also function as a backup life-line for SATLUG folks 
> pounding on the doors (e.g. the mail list could function as a backup life-line 
> to dedicated internal Rackers that folks could send from their phone (or 
> whatever) to get everyone in if someone's dropped the ball).  
> I'm just back into town today and am starting to work on streamlining these 
> final issues. Get us the +1/-1 vote counts.. and any additional/outstanding 
> concerns and John and I will work on getting them addressed.
> Thanks all,
> Tweeks

The information contained within the referenced, linked, or directed
email communication is intended to be a confidential communication
between the original sender and recipient, and is to be treated as
confidential. If you believe you have received this or any other email
in error, please contact r3d91ll at grandecom.net.

More information about the SATLUG mailing list