[SATLUG] what is the best virtual machine?
mayfield_mark at att.net
Mon Jun 14 17:17:57 CDT 2010
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 16:18 -0500, redpill wrote:
> I am currently experimenting in this area. I have tried Virtualbox and
> love it for desktop virtualization. Usually i run XP on Virtualbox on
> my mythbox so that I watch movies with netflix. I have also used it
> with success on my T60 to run various flavors of BSD, Linux and windows.
> That said when I tried using Virtualbox for server virtualization i have
> found it very much lacking in guest performance. I/O delays are usually
> pretty high and the system in general becomes unresoponive when runing a
> domain controller, a file server, a xp guest and an win7 guest. Mind
> you this is on a quad core (Q6600), with 6 gigs of ram and a perc 5/i
> card with a raid 5 1.5tb.
> now I have switched to a "real" virtualization by going with a KVM
> solution. At first I tried Proxmox (highly recommend for noobs, very
> easy install Browser driven KVM solution). now I have moved on to
> Ubuntu's KVM solution which utilizes Virtual-manager (VNC console
> management rather then Browser). Of the two KVM solutions I prefer
> using a VNC solution over a browser solution as the browser solutions
I don't know how proxmox does their browser configuration. I did a
little custom stuff with kvm through a web browser and I actually used
VNC through the web browser. TightVNC comes with a java applet which you
your web browser does have to have the java runtime plugin functional.
have to use it to serve your machines through a web browser. They
probably used it to do more advanced stuff than what I did as far as a
web interface is concerned, mine was pretty plain.
> That said, both of these solutions have
> shown remarkable improvement over VirtualBox when it comes to guest
> server performance.
> IMO use Virtualbox for running that a vm or two of windows in a Linux
> environment (or vice versa) and use a KVM solution for server
More information about the SATLUG