[SATLUG] Fwd: TEKsystems - SATLUG Sponsorship
mark at kandm-solutions.com
Sat Apr 16 23:47:25 CDT 2011
I don't really have any standpoint as far as the sponsor thing. Couldn't
care either way about Rackspace or this other place. I was sent to
Rackspace after they asked the Alamo Colleges to send some of their best
students to one of their locations for an internship program. It was not
anything of the sort and I was not impressed at all with Rackspace. To
this day I am not very fond of Rackspace.
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 19:22 -0500, Kyle Chrisman wrote:
> Lets not go down this road...
> The way into Rackspace from a recruiting standpoint is very narrow.
> They are not likely to find their way in this way if their intentions
> are to recruit for Rackspace simply because that is not how it works.
> On the flip side however, bringing a recruiter in through Rackspace's
> side doors could be very bad for the current relationship if they start
> trying to take Rackspace employees. Rackspace employees are some of the
> best talent in the world and to have a recruiter use SATLUG to get in
> would have nothing but negative consequences. As Rackers, we jealously
> guard our culture.
> Please do not bring a recruiting organization in as a sponsor at the
> regular meetings held at the Rackspace HQ. I am making this request as
> your new primary Rackspace liason/host at the SATLUG monthly meetings
> not as the official stance of Rackspace itself. Even if TekSystems were
> to communicate their intentions in writing and we were able to get it
> approved... this is NOT a good idea and I am asking you not to even
> consider it.
> If SATLUG wants to bring TekSystems in as a sponsor for events not
> hosted on Rackspace soil I really don't have a problem with that, in
> fact I would encourage it just because I know TekSystems having been in
> their pool of recruits for years and years.
> Rackspace may have some official position on this or process with regard
> to bringing other organizations in as sponsors to regular meetings... I
> can investigate that if you want. As far as I'm aware there really
> isn't much left to sponsor at the regular meetings as was already
> mentioned but if there is lets have an offline conversation about it and
> I will see what we can do.
> Recruiters are crafty and know how to network. If they want access to
> Rackers they will find their way in... but please do not just open the
> door blindly.
> I am going to request that the SATLUG leaders talk to me directly if
> there is more to say on this. I don't want to bring a bunch of
> bureaucracy into this but Rackspace tries really hard to make sure the
> SATLUG needs are met at the monthly meetings so if there a current
> unsatisfied need that warrants this discussion of letting others in,
> lets please talk about it privately before this gets anymore consideration.
> I will follow this up with just saying that TekSystems is one of the
> very best technical recruiting firms I've ever worked with. Granted
> they are still recruiters so that can be like comparing used car sales
> men but still. I am a HUGE promoter of their services and integrity.
> The few folks at TekSystems that I've had the pleasure of working with
> have led me through the doors of some very interesting and lucrative
> opportunities like the Microsoft to RHEL conversion NTTA did on their
> entire infrastructure a few years back up in Dallas. I didn't always
> make the cut but man they really do see some interesting projects and
> they are on my very, very short, top 4 list of recruiting firms that I
> will actually work with.
> Thanks guys.
> Kyle Chrisman
> On 4/14/2011 4:54 PM, John Pappas wrote:
> > My only thought was "I bet they want access to Rackspace" since the rack
> > could be a major client for such a staffing firm, and SATLUG provides access
> > to both the company (meetings at the castle) and employees (Rackers in the
> > LUG).
> > As Ernest mentions, it is important to be cognizant of the expectations for
> > both sides: what is the extent of sponsorship: what the sponsor expects for
> > the support and what the sponsored receives from the support.
> > As I am a freelance consultant I work with companies like this all the time,
> > most relationships are fairly benign; but Ernest's concerns are valid.
> > Don't tell them you are looking for another opportunity unless you are
> > actually looking and willing to accept the potentially repeated contacts.
> > Besides, it is more likely that unless your resume fits a current and active
> > position requirement, you will not be contacted unless you continue to
> > contact them and update your resume regularly.
> > In most cases, MUCH more spam results from posting resume to Monster,
> > CareerBuilder, Ladders, etc, than simply giving a resume to Tek or similar
> > regional staffing firm. Sometimes, their system is such that they will
> > match nation wide against your resume, but not usually. I get MUCH, MUCH,
> > MUCH, more email/phone calls from Monster/CareerBuilder than simply giving
> > my resume to Robert Half or TekSystems. Even then, it tapers off once your
> > post is more than 90 days, as recruiters using those tools will aim for
> > newer/fresher candidates (unless you have a niche/obscure/rare skill). That
> > is why I have to update the boards every 60 days or so to keep fresh leads
> > coming my way.
> > Just my .02,
> > John
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 21:09, Nathan Oxhandler<nathan at gvtc.com> wrote:
> >> Anyone have any thing for or against this?
> >> Nathan
> >> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> >> From: "Barry Blanchard"<bblancha at teksystems.com>
> >> To: director4 at satlug.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:18:54 PM
> >> Subject: TEKsystems - SATLUG Sponsorship
> >> Hi Nathan,
> >> Would SATLUG be interested in having TEKsystems as a sponsor for any of the
> >> meetings? I figured some of the members may also benefit from knowing about
> >> the different open jobs around town as well.
> >> Thanks and please let me know if you all are interested in our
> >> participation.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Barry Blanchard Account Manager
> >> 1100 NW Loop 410 Suite 210 San Antonio, Tx 78213
> >> 877.856.2059 T 210.384.3039 M 954.461.0981
> >> F 210.384.3050
> >> cid:image012.jpg at 01CB1E81.A861D770
> >> http://www.teksystems.com
> >> This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information
> >> that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure
> >> to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of
> >> this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons
> >> other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail
> >> so that we may correct our internal records. Please then delete the original
> >> message (including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you.
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SATLUG mailing list
> >> SATLUG at satlug.org
> >> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to manage/unsubscribe
> >> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
More information about the SATLUG