[SATLUG] OT: Android phone recommendations

gbear14275 at gmail.com gbear14275 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 16 17:37:56 CDT 2011

The only thing I will say (from my personal experience) is stay away from  
Verizon. There network is good but their customer service is appalling!  
They are also VERY hack-UN-friendly. They are notorious for locking down  
phone features and then trying to sell them back to you. I recently  
switched to T-Mobile and it has been fantastic. Great speeds and network so  

My two cents I guess would be go with Sprint or T-Mobile. Verizon is  
expensive, greedy and draconian... I've heard the same about AT&T.


On Jul 16, 2011 1:45pm, David Kowis <dkowis at shlrm.org> wrote:

> Hash: SHA1

> On 07/16/2011 04:45 AM, Geoff Edmonson wrote:

> > On 07/15/2011 08:01 PM, Alan Lesmerises wrote:

> >> It looks like it's time for my wife & I to replace our cell phones.

> >> I've been holding off getting one of the smart phones until the prices

> >> came down, and it looks like they're a bit more reasonable now. The

> >> only real question at this point is, which one?

> >>

> >> For reasons that should be obvious for THIS group, I want to go with

> >> an Android, but what kind of experiences have you had? Do they all

> >> generally connect with desktop PCs pretty readily, of are there some

> >> hoops you have to jump through to get them to connect? What about the

> >> differences between a Windows PC & a Linux system?

> >>

> >> Any insight you can provide would be appreciated. Thanks.

> >

> >

> > There's been a lot of good information given, Alan.

> >

> > From a Spring HTC Evo4G owner, I will say that if you get a phone with a

> > touch screen, get a blue-tooth device. Avoid holding the thing up to

> > your head. Not that I'm worried about cancer, but the touch-screen, at

> > least it's been my experience, when it gets wet with sweat from holding

> > the thing to your ear for more than a few minutes at a time, the

> > remaining DNA that remains on the touch-screen causes the phone to go

> > -nuts-. That's been my only bitch about a touch-screen phone.

> I cannot say that I've ever had that problem with my Evo.

> > I prefer the Evo, but the Blackberry has some advantages... and I guess

> > it's my personal preference, but in -some- cases, NOT having the

> > touch-screen is sometimes advantageous.

> >

> I have used the EVO and I now have an EVO Shift, both rooted, and both

> work well. The Epic 4G doesn't work so well, the wife didn't like it.

> The EVO and EVO shift are both easily rootable, the shift has a slightly

> better Sense UI, and it has a physical keyboard.

> David


> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/


> sJcIQwPnsC15FTAOzTHAxKev0c3OS60G9w5BuRzEVHBf+kAWAwDeyMlM4Ld4PnDg

> o+/NcTowqkoFArhqebhg287qp6Ok+y3JxVE5f4MmWBXdH53cO8cS2rKnHTeE1CUK

> +yhc8IY2emnfUSUPaYEGF4hG0Wsm+mH099WpyI3JtManLZSsa3iCGLo4GT9g5bih

> mE/Fys5zfYKoDfL+elV5J3wX7tJjdIfFsUE17c0a9ekHADv+pmODhiDIh6/TiH7s

> bSKEPcccALy3U19CRAQxWb31/iNmnBCx5Cw7nbWVUB48fDUf+/n2xXqN2YkK6/v5

> 0h6jVbptbi8CNPlPqc0A8M6Ft6vkBGGJIPlEyT2GTWUeqxvqxuTW6o6q/Mo1pqSg

> R4i+mgxfFNHfGBEHCcaFvvnbKpmTewrpgP2zy79bTokFviMyOFeYRoEfBdg+QnMf

> WZDo2gpItd2cft4VcGt3mhBieV7zMZdAKmHDgAyXXg==

> =ed2u


> --

> _______________________________________________

> SATLUG mailing list

> SATLUG at satlug.org

> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to manage/unsubscribe

> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)

More information about the SATLUG mailing list