jonkelley at gmail.com
Tue Dec 2 07:58:20 CST 2014
I'm happy Debian forked.
Systemd violates unix philosophy: do one thing, do it well, pipe programs
together, use shell scripts where feasible.
Worst of all, it violates Debian's rule of choice, you can have 10 window
managers, 3 different cron systems, 3 mail systems, 4 dns systems, 6 web
servers, but only 1 init system? I understand this will make init scripts
among distros easier and streamline a lot, but the forced nature of this is
what I'm against.
I will support any project which demands and enforces the unix philosophy
and linux pro-choice that made it the system we love.
* JonK gives kris a colourful gift box with question marks and tux's
printed all over. "Open it!"
* Kris looks around nervously and slowly opens it
<JonK> it's empty!
<JonK> the box represents what an open-source linux programmer makes in a
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Christopher Lemire <
christopher.lemire at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 2:32 PM, David Kowis <dkowis at shlrm.org> wrote:
> > On 11/30/2014 01:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Did anyone else see this? https://devuan.org/
> >> What do you think?
> > I think competition is always good, and if it's worth using, it'll be
> > popular.
> > Personally I wish they'd move away from sysvinit, and use uselessd,
> > which brings the good things of systemd, without all the monolithic
> > stupidity. But that's just what I'd like to see.
> >> -- Bruce
> > --
> Perhaps forking uselessd again could resolve the issue? :P
> SATLUG mailing list
> SATLUG at satlug.org
> http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug to manage/unsubscribe
> Powered by Rackspace (www.rackspace.com)
More information about the SATLUG